An Interview with “Mr. Constitution”, John Chambers,

188 0

author of The Constitution of the United States: A Study Guide

3 Constitutional clashes about to divide the nation

For more than 25 years, John Chambers, known to audiences as “Mr. Constitution”, has dedicated himself to educating Americans young-and-old about the contents, history and meaning of the US Constitution and why the 230-year-old document is relevant to their daily lives.

“Today, as our society becomes increasingly politically turbulent, it’s more important than ever that we understand and embrace the concepts and provisions of good governance drafted into our Constitution by the nation’s founding fathers,” says Chambers, who notes that an increasing number of political groups and factions are demanding societal changes and the passage of new laws that forward their ideologies.

“Many of the currently proposed changes would effectively shred well-reasoned, carefully worded, hard-won provisions in the Constitution’s Bill of Rights. For that reason it becomes vital we understand the language and key terms used by the Founding Fathers in each Section, Article, and Amendment and also the historical context that prompted their inclusion in what some historians have called “the world’s greatest document”.

Chambers points out three Constitutional issues poised to trigger fiery debates and heated protests in the street as we move into the long hot summer ahead:

1. Free Speech vs Hate Speech

A large percentage of students on college campuses and others believe that “hateful speech” and the utterance of “hurtful words” deserve no protection under the 1st Amendment even in the face of recent Supreme Court rulings where in June 2017 the justices unanimously observed, “Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express “the thought that we hate.” Nevertheless, students continue to challenge Constitutionally-protected speech while claiming that being exposed to upsetting words and ideas justifies violent responses like rioting, arson, assault, and other attacks against the speaker. “Students need to be taught by their professors that the solution to hate speech is not less speech; it’s more speech,” says Chambers.

2. The 2nd Amendment vs Gun Restrictions

Because the framers knew that the right to bear arms would be the one right most viscously attacked and, if possible, taken away from citizens, the 2nd Amendment was drafted with a preamble to clarify its purpose: “A well- regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state.” The Amendment ensures that America remains a “free state” through an armed and well-regulated militia. The Amendment’s purpose is not to ensure that citizens have guns for hunting. What types of weapons are protected by this Amendment? Weapons of the kind that would help the population maintain its freedom, which was won through bloody conflict during the Revolutionary War. As memory of the war faded, “scary” weapons started to be banned to make citizens feel safer, even if that meant they were less secure.

3. State Powers vs Federal Powers (Sanctuary Cities and States)

In recent decades, the political differences between rural areas and metropolitan areas seem to have become more severe, causing political splits in certain parts of the nation. Federal law will almost always prevail when it interferes or conflicts with state law. However, there are many examples where tension between state and federal law remains unresolved. For instance, several states have legalized both the medical and recreational use of cannabis (marijuana), which is still a Schedule I controlled substance under federal law. Be ready for heated debates in Congress and protests in the street about State vs Federal legislative powers.


In addition to brushing up on the Constitution with the help of his study guide, Chambers recommends we prep ourselves for the upcoming debates over Hate Speech Laws, Gun Control, State’s Rights, and other Constitutional issues by watching the entertaining and educational feature length film, In Search of Liberty.

“The movie, which has been described as ‘Ben Franklin meets Back to the Future’, isn’t meant to turn those who watch it into Constitutional scholars,” says Chambers. “But it does entertain general audiences with a great story that portrays the Constitution’s purpose and importance, and shows us what our lives might be like if the Constitution were to be lost or abandoned.”


1. You say that the five First Amendment freedoms (religion, speech, press, assembly, petition for redress of grievances) were listed in that order for a reason. Please explain.

2. Students are being taught that “hate speech” is illegal. Does the Supreme Court agree?

3. Why do we have the 2nd Amendment?

4. You tell students that States don’t have rights; they have “powers”. Please explain.

5. You are promoting a theatrical film released on DVD entitled In Search of Liberty. Tell us about the film.

6. Where can we learn more about the film and see the trailer? (


For more than 25 years, John Chambers, known to audiences as “Mr. Constitution”, has dedicated himself to educating Americans young-and-old about the contents, history and meaning of the US Constitution and why the 230-year-old document is relevant to their daily lives – now more than ever!

Kyplex Cloud Security Seal - Click for Verification